Megacities: environmental friend or foe?

Mexico City (Photo by Pablo Lopez Luz)

More than half the world’s population now lives in cities. By 2030, the world is projected to have 43 megacities, each with more than 10 million people.

Cities are often hailed as saviours for many of the world’s environmental woes. These green metropolises, with their compact buildings in close proximity to infrastructure and public transportation, increase efficiencies and reduce energy use. Cities, which are responsible for higher per-capita economic and social activity, consume fewer resources per capita. We are told that density equals efficiency, and efficiency equals sustainability.

The idea that cities are inherently sustainable is being promoted by a group calling themselves the “eco-modernists.” This influential group of scholars recently issued an “ Ecomodernist Manifesto,” an approach to sustainability that recommends “decoupling” humanity from nature and “intensifying many human activities — particularly farming, energy extraction, forestry and settlement — so that they use less land and interfere less with the natural world.” Economic development, they suggest, is an indispensable precondition to preserving the environment.

Economic development, however, is not without its environmental consequences. The average New Yorker, for example, consumes almost 25 times more energy than someone in Kolkata, India (population 4.6 million). This is to be expected, but it also demonstrates the wealth paradox: as economic activity of a city increases, resource-efficient infrastructure is created — but people begin to consume more stuff, discard more waste, and use more energy (and often at a pace that is quicker than the population growth). This ultimately has negative environmental consequences.

Mexico City (Photo by Pablo Lopez Luz)

A paper recently published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences sheds further light on the assumption that megacities are inherently sustainable. The researchers looked at 27 of the world’s largest cities and analyzed their “urban metabolism” — the flow of energy and materials through the city. They found that while megacities currently account for almost 7 per cent of the world’s population, they also consume 9 per cent of its electricity, 10 per cent of its gasoline, and produce almost 13 per cent of global waste. So what happened to the efficiency that we are told is an inherent result of density?

It turns out that while density does equal efficiency, “megacity” does not necessarily equal density. Megacities do encompass those places that we typically associate with dense and culturally vibrant urban centres: New York City, Tokyo, London. But what’s not often taken into account is the fact that to keep them running, these cities also require surrounding areas such as industrial lands, ports, suburbs. In other words, the environmental benefits of a city’s dense urban core can be outweighed by the resource-inefficient, yet essential, areas on its periphery. They are, in fact, two sides of the same coin.

Mexico City (Photo by Pablo Lopez Luz)

An area that the researchers didn’t explore, but which potentially has an impact on resource use, is the psychological impact that increased urbanization has on sustainability. As people retreat from rural areas into cities, their interaction with nature also decreases. This is particularly true for the developing world. National Geographic’s annual Greendex Survey which measures nations’ consumption habits and attitudes, shows that people who are more connected with the environment demonstrate more sustainable behaviour; the more urbanized, the more unsustainable the behaviour. As environmental journalist George Monbiot points out, this leads to a vicious circle: the richer we are, the more we consume, the more harm we do to the environment, the less we empathize with the natural world, the more we try to fill the void by buying more stuff.

What this research shows is just how complex urban sustainability issues really are. Rather than simply praising the benefits of increased urbanization, then, perhaps we need to start thinking about what it all really means.

Originally published at on June 8, 2015.




I write about cities, buildings, philosophy, sustainability, technology, culture & design.

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

Karmenu Vella, the Former European Commissioner for the Environment, is on board for Global…

GoSun is bringing the solar revolution to your home @ CES 2021

821 million reasons bootcamp teams will disrupt hunger

What is Zero Waste?

A girl thinking hard about zero waste tips: buying in bulk, bringing your own grocery bag, and only using reusable utensils

What Is Really Behind The Loss Of Precious Wildlife?

Embodied carbon, the hidden emission in infrastructure

Full lifecycle analysis diagram

Would You Support a Covid Tax?

Ostrich art illustration

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Mark Bessoudo

Mark Bessoudo

I write about cities, buildings, philosophy, sustainability, technology, culture & design.

More from Medium

Deep Roots Farm: A First Generation Black Farmer Awaits Long Overdue Federal Support

black farmer at sunrise

Blasting Medieval Myths

Why women are missing in the news, daily